Compare models

iPhone 16 Plus • Unlocked vs Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) • Unlocked

  • 1-year warranty
  • Free standard shipping
  • Free 30-day returns
iPhone 16 Plus • Unlocked
Starting at

Refurbished price:$371

Versus $829.00 new

See options

Differences at a glance

The Apple iPhone 16 Plus (2024) and the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) are large-screen smartphones designed to handle daily media consumption, productivity, and communication. While the iPhone 16 Plus runs on Apple's closed iOS platform, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G operates on Android and includes a dedicated physical stylus pen. Both devices cater to users seeking expansive display real estate, but they differ significantly in their operating systems, accessory integration, and hardware ecosystems.

Available Models

Color

Storage (GB)

Scores

Durability

These two devices approach software updates and physical longevity through very different manufacturer support frameworks and hardware durability designs.

  • Software Support Window: The iPhone 16 Plus receives multi-year operating system upgrades and security patches spanning many years, whereas the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G offers a more limited Android version update cycle.
  • Build and Materials: The iPhone features color-infused glass backs and aluminum framing protected by robust front glass, while the Motorola model utilizes a vegan leather back finish that provides a distinct tactile grip.
  • Expected Lifespan: Both devices are built for daily wear, though extended software backing typically allows iOS devices to retain feature relevance longer into their lifecycle.

Release Year

2024

2024

Last OS Compatibility

Yes

Yes

Foldable

No

No

Performance

Daily speed, responsiveness, and energy management vary between these models depending on the applications and multitasking loads involved.

  • App Loading and Multitasking: The iPhone 16 Plus handles demanding mobile games and intensive processing tasks with ease, whereas the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G manages standard web browsing, messaging, and lighter apps comfortably.
  • Storage Configurations: Both devices offer ample baseline storage tiers for photos and apps, but the Motorola model supports expandable storage via a microSD card slot.
  • Battery Behavior: Both units comfortably sustain full-day use under typical conditions, though physical battery capacities and energy efficiency profiles differ between platforms.

Screen quality

Visual immersion is a primary focus for both handsets, each featuring large panels suited for streaming video and viewing documents.

  • Display Technology: The iPhone 16 Plus uses a high-resolution Super Retina XDR OLED panel, while the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G features a vibrant pOLED display with smooth scrolling characteristics.
  • Outdoor Visibility: Both screens reach high peak brightness levels to maintain clarity and legibility under direct sunlight.
  • Viewing Area: Each phone provides a 6.7-inch viewing canvas, making them well-suited for split-screen multitasking and media viewing.

Resolution

1290 x 2796

1080 x 2400

Screen type

Super Retina XDR OLED

P-OLED

Audiovisual

Multimedia capture and audio output capabilities provide distinct experiences for photography enthusiasts and casual content consumers.

  • Camera System Capabilities: The iPhone 16 Plus utilizes a dual rear camera setup with advanced computational photography tools, while the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G pairs a main stabilized sensor with an ultra-wide lens.
  • Video and Low Light: Apple's model excels in high-dynamic-range video recording and low-light exposure balance, whereas the Motorola device delivers dependable everyday snapshots.
  • Audio Experience: Both devices feature stereo speakers that produce clear sound for hands-free calls and casual video viewing, while the Motorola model retains a traditional headphone jack.

Main camera

48 megapixels

50 megapixels

Front camera

12 megapixels

32 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Practical everyday features, physical controls, and connectivity standards shape how these devices integrate into daily routines.

  • Input Methods: The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G includes an integrated physical stylus for precise note-taking and sketching, whereas the iPhone 16 Plus relies entirely on touch input alongside a customizable side button control.
  • Connectivity and Ports: Both models support rapid 5G cellular networks and Wi-Fi standards, with the iPhone utilizing a reversible USB-C connection port shared by modern Apple accessories.
  • Physical Dimensions: Despite identical screen sizes, the iPhone 16 Plus and Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G feature distinct weight distributions and ergonomic corner curves.

Weight

185 oz

7 oz

Screen size (inches)

6.7

6.7

Network

5G

5G

SIM card

eSIM

Physical SIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

Connector

USB-C (USB 2)

USB-C

What the community thinks

User feedback highlights distinct preferences for each device based on operating system familiarity and utility features. Owners of the iPhone 16 Plus frequently praise its fluid system animations, long-term software update consistency, and reliable camera output. Conversely, users of the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G often emphasize the convenience of the integrated pen accessory, expandable storage flexibility, and the inclusion of a traditional headphone jack as major everyday benefits. Common criticisms for the iPhone involve its closed software environment, while Motorola users occasionally note that camera performance under challenging lighting can feel limited compared to higher-tier flagships.

Users prioritizing seamless ecosystem integration, extended software support, and robust video capabilities may prefer the iPhone 16 Plus. Meanwhile, users prioritizing physical note-taking tools, expandable storage, and an open Android operating system will find the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G well-suited to their needs. For buyers exploring sustainable purchasing habits, choosing a quality-assured refurbished option provides an eco-friendly alternative that reduces electronic waste without compromising on performance testing.

Our recent comparisons